Effect of chronic heavy tobacco smoking on ankle fracture healing.

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco smoking is linked to an elevated risk of osteomyelitis and delayed healing in long bone fractures. However, the impact of smoking on bone union and soft tissue recovery following ankle fractures remains unclear. This study presents a retrospective comparative analysis evaluating the effects of chronic heavy tobacco smoking on the healing process and outcomes of ankle fractures after surgical interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 220 consecutive cases of chronic heavy smokers (CHS) with closed ankle fractures who were referred to our unit for further treatment. A control group, consisting of 220 age- and sex-matched individuals (non-smokers with closed ankle fractures), was identified for comparative analysis. We collected clinical data, including pre-existing comorbidities, Lauge-Hansen fracture classification, necessity for surgery, and the surgical procedures performed. The primary outcomes investigated were the time required for fracture union and wound healing. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications such as prolonged pain, bleeding, swelling, infection, compartment syndrome, and neurovascular impairment, as well as the incidence of delayed union, non-union, and the need for further intervention. Both cohorts were monitored for a minimum of 24 months. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that the surgical cohort of chronic heavy smokers exhibited a statistically significant delay in fracture union compared to both the conservatively managed smokers and the control group. Further scrutiny of the surgical cohort of chronic smokers indicated a significant correlation between smoking and extended postoperative pain duration, persistent swelling at the fracture site, and both superficial and deep wound infections. Additionally, these patients experienced delays in both fracture union and wound healing when compared to the control group. Similarly, the conservatively managed chronic smokers showed a marginal increase in the incidence of post-injury pain duration, extended swelling at the fracture site, and delayed union compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Patients who are chronic heavy smokers and require surgical intervention for ankle fractures should be made aware of their increased risk for delayed fracture union and poor wound healing. Orthopedic surgeons should proactively encourage these patients to participate in smoking cessation programs.

Mental Health Polypharmacy in "Non-Coded" Primary Care Patients: The Effect of Deprescribing.

Background: Mental health (MH) polypharmacy, defined as prescribing multiple mental health medications for the same condition, presents significant challenges in clinical practice. With varying prevalence rates and an increasing trend, particularly in the UK, this deprescribing prospective quality improvement project aimed to address the complexities and risks associated with MH polypharmacy. Patients and Methods: A large primary care centre in London was selected for this project. Electronic records of 667 patients (non-coded in mental health lists) were analysed as a result of the absence of a Systematised Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) for mental health. Seventy-two non-coded patients exhibiting "same-class" as well as "adjunctive" and "augmentation" polypharmacy were identified. Their demographic and health data, including MH diagnoses, physical status, and lifestyle habits, were evaluated. This deprescribing prospective project included 68 patients and employed a model inspired by the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, focusing on reducing psychotropic, adjunctive, and augmentative medications while monitoring mental health control through face-to-face consultations using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment-7 (GAD-7) scores, alongside physical health parameters. Results: The project revealed a significant decrease in the average number of psychotropic and adjunct medications from initial consultations to the end of the 18-month period. Additionally, a marked reduction in reported side effects and drug interactions was observed. Improvements in mental health control, as evidenced by PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores, were noted. Physical health parameters, including BMI, blood pressure, heart rate, HbA1c, and cholesterol levels, also showed significant improvements. Educational initiatives for patients and clinicians were successfully implemented, contributing to these positive outcomes. Discussion: The project faced challenges like balancing medication reduction with mental health stability, patient apprehension, and the absence of standardised protocols. However, the successful reduction in medication numbers and the improvement in health outcomes highlight the effectiveness of the model. This project underscores the necessity of a tailored approach to MH polypharmacy, emphasising continuous education, clinical titration, and adherence to guidelines. Future research is needed to develop clear guidelines for medication combination in mental health care and to understand the long-term effects of polypharmacy in mental health populations. Conclusions: This project demonstrates the potential for significant improvements in the management of MH polypharmacy. By carefully managing medication reductions and employing a comprehensive care approach, including patient education and clinician training, the project achieved improvements in both mental and physical health outcomes. These findings suggest a promising direction for future practices in MH polypharmacy management.

Cross-sectional Survey of Medical student perceptions of And desires for Research and Training pathways (SMART): an analysis of prospective cohort study of UK medical students.

OBJECTIVE: Clinician-scientists are critical to medical innovation and research. However, the number of clinician scientists in the UK has been declining steadily over the last decade. One of the cited reasons is poor student recruitment to academic training pathways. The SMART study aims to assess current student perceptions on research and identify key factors influencing whether a student is interested in research. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study between January and May 2022. SETTING: This was a multi-centre national study with data collected across 40 universities offering medical courses in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were UK medical students enrolled in medicine for 21/22 academic year. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The main outcomes were related to participant perceptions on research and whether they were interested in engaging with research in their future career. These measures were correlated with demographic and non-demographic details using regression analyses. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred seventy-four individuals participated in the SMART survey from 40 medical schools. Nearly half the participants felt there were barriers preventing them from doing research (46.67%) and almost three-quarters felt it was at least somewhat difficult to combine research with medical school (73.49%). Of the options available, most commonly students did not want to pursue an academic career (43.11%) or training pathway (42.49%). However, most participants felt it was useful to do research at medical school (59.54%) and were also interested in doing more research in the future (69.16%). Regression analysis identified many factors influencing student's perceptions of research including year of study, gender, socioeconomic status, family background, research exposure at medical school, ethnicity, and country of pre-university education. CONCLUSIONS: The SMART study is the first of its kind in the UK, shedding light on medical student perceptions. While some express strong interest in academic careers, a larger proportion show a broader interest in research. Demographic factors like gender, parental occupation, and socioeconomic status play a role. Further exploration is needed for specific groups to address barriers, promote research, and boost academic pathway recruitment.

Epidemiological trends of pyogenic spondylodiscitis in Germany: an EANS Spine Section Study.

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In Germany, a comprehensive understanding of its epidemiology and inpatient management outcomes is limited, hindering the optimisation of therapeutic strategies. This study aimed to characterise the evolving epidemiological trends of pyogenic spondylodiscitis in Germany, and concurrently evaluate inpatient management strategies and outcomes. We performed a retrospective population-based study of spondylodiscitis cases in Germany from 2005 to 2021, utilising data from the German Federal Statistical Office database. The parameters assessed were incidence trends, demographic characteristics, inpatient management strategies, and inpatient mortality. The study found a significant rise in the population-adjusted incidence of spondylodiscitis in Germany from 2005 to 2021, increasing by 104% from 5.4 to 11.0 cases per 100,000 individuals (p < 0.001). The highest number of diagnoses was recorded in 2019. Age group-adjusted data revealed the largest relative changes in the "90 + " age group, followed by the "80-89" and "70-79" age groups. These increases were not solely attributable to population changes but were also confirmed after calculating the age-group-adjusted incidence rates. Additionally, our statistical analysis demonstrated that both age and year significantly influenced the incidence of spondylodiscitis. Over the same period, inpatient mortality also surged significantly by 347% (p < 0.001), with the highest increase recorded in the 90 + age group, observing a 2450% rise (p < 0.001). The mean length of inpatient stay decreased by 15% (p < 0.05). Concurrently, there was a significant increase in surgical interventions using spinal stabilisation procedures (p < 0.001), which might suggest a shift in the treatment paradigm for spondylodiscitis. The results underscore a concerning rise in spondylodiscitis incidence and mortality in Germany, particularly affecting the ageing population. A notable shift towards surgical intervention was observed. The data highlights the urgent necessity for high-level evidence studies comparing surgical versus conservative treatment, thereby guiding optimised therapeutic strategies.

Methodological and ethical challenges in the use of focused ultrasound for blood-brain barrier disruption in neuro-oncology.

BACKGROUND: Focused ultrasound (FUS) shows promise for enhancing drug delivery to the brain by temporarily opening the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and it is increasingly used in the clinical setting to treat brain tumours. It remains however unclear whether FUS is being introduced in an ethically and methodologically sound manner. The IDEAL-D framework for the introduction of surgical innovations and the SYRCLE and ROBINS-I tools for assessing the risk of bias in animal studies and non-randomized trials, respectively, provide a comprehensive evaluation for this. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review on FUS in neuro-oncology was conducted. Subsequently, the included studies were evaluated using the IDEAL-D framework, SYRCLE, and ROBINS-I tools. RESULTS: In total, 19 published studies and 12 registered trials were identified. FUS demonstrated successful BBB disruption, increased drug delivery, and improved survival rates. However, the SYRCLE analysis revealed a high risk of bias in animal studies, while the ROBINS-I analysis found that most human studies had a high risk of bias due to a lack of blinding and heterogeneous samples. Of the 15 pre-clinical stage 0 studies, only six had formal ethical approval, and only five followed animal care policies. Both stage 1 studies and stage 1/2a studies failed to provide information on patient data confidentiality. Overall, no animal or human study reached the IDEAL-D stage endpoint. CONCLUSION: FUS holds promise for enhancing drug delivery to the brain, but its development and implementation must adhere to rigorous safety standards using the established ethical and methodological frameworks. The complementary use of IDEAL-D, SYRCLE, and ROBINS-I tools indicates a high risk of bias and ethical limitations in both animal and human studies, highlighting the need for further improvements in study design for a safe implementation of FUS in neuro-oncology.

Football (Soccer) as a Probable Cause of Long-Term Neurological Impairment and Neurodegeneration: A Narrative Review of the Debate.

Football (soccer) is the most widely played sport across the globe. Due to some recent high-profile cases and epidemiological studies suggesting football can lead to neurodegeneration, scientific and public interest has been piqued. This has resulted in research into whether an association between football participation and neurodegeneration or neurological impairment is present. It has been theorised that a combination of repeated sub-concussive and concussive injuries, due to ball-heading and head collisions, may lead to neurodegeneration. However, evidence remains conflicting. Due to the popularity of the sport, and the serious conditions it has been linked to, it is important to determine whether repeated head impacts during football participation can play a causative role in neurodegenerative disease. To answer this question, a review of the current literature was carried out. Epidemiological evidence showed a higher incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis amongst amateur and professional footballers and that footballers in positions that involve less contact and heading, e.g., goalkeepers lead significantly longer lives. Additionally, imaging studies reach a similar conclusion, reporting changes in brain structure, blood flow, and inflammatory markers in footballers when compared to controls. However, studies looking at an association between heading frequency and cognition show a lack of consensus on whether a higher heading exposure results in reduced cognition. Similarly, in neuropathological studies, signs of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) have been found in some former players, with contrasting studies suggesting low levels of CTE-type pathology are found in the general population, regardless of exposure to head trauma. The majority of studies suggest a link between football and neurodegenerative disease. However, the high prevalence of retrospective cohort and cross-sectional studies, often plagued by recall bias, undermine the conclusions drawn. Therefore, until larger prospective cohort studies are conducted, concrete conclusions cannot be made. However, caution can be exercised to limit head impacts.

Quality of life following photodynamic therapy for head and neck pathologies: An exploratory study.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare related quality of life (QoL) is defined as the impact one's level of health and wellbeing has on a number of domains, including physical, mental, spiritual and social functions. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a cancer treatment modality, is increasingly used to treat or palliate head and neck pathologies. Due to the complex nature of this area of the body, both the pathology and the treatment of it can severely affect the quality of life. Thus far, no questionnaire has been developed which focuses on quality-of-life post-PDT of head and neck pathologies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have developed the University College London Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients undergoing PDT in the Head and Neck, using meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC) as the photosensitiser. This was modified from the University of Washington quality of life (UW-QOL) questionnaire. Thirty-eight patients who received mTHPC-PDT for various head and neck pathologies completed the questionnaire, with a mean follow-up of 56 days. RESULTS: All patients reported improved QoL following mTHPC-PDT. The main problem that was reported was post-PDT pain, which is a common side effect. Visual symptoms, breathing, speaking and swallowing problems improved significantly in the 4th week following treatment and significant improvement in activities of daily living, social life, mood and anxiety were reported in the subsequent weeks. CONCLUSIONS: mTHPC-PDT confers improvement in QoL score in selected head and neck cancer patients with figures comparable to other treatment modalities. This exploratory study demonstrated patterns of QoL outcome. Further work needs to be done for survey validation and inclusion of a larger cohort which will allow optimal sub-group analysis and help guide further interventions.

From Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Research: Photodynamic Therapy Applications in Head and Neck Malignancies and Vascular Anomalies.

Head and neck cancers are largely squamous cell carcinomas derived from the epithelial lining of the structures in the region, and are often classified anatomically into oral, oropharyngeal, nasopharyngeal and laryngeal carcinomas. The region's component structures serve complex and intricate functions, such as speaking, swallowing and breathing, which are often compromised by these neoplasms. Such lesions may also cause disfigurement, leading to distressing social and psychological issues. Conventional treatments of these neoplasms usually involve surgical intervention with or without chemoradiotherapy. These have shown to be efficacious; however, they can also cause damage to healthy as well as diseased tissue, exacerbating the aforementioned problems. Access to a given region to deliver the treatments is also often a problem, due to the complex anatomical structures involved. The use of photodynamic therapy in the head and neck region has been established for about two decades. In this review, we looked at the basic mechanisms of this intervention, examined its use in common head and neck malignancies and vascular anomalies, and reported on the most recent clinical studies. We further included a clinical guide which can help replicate the use of this technology by any unit. Based on this review, photodynamic therapy has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of head and neck malignancies and vascular tumours. This therapy can be targeted to the diseased tissue and causes no damage to underlying structures. Recent studies have shown this therapy to be as effective as conventional therapies, without causing major adverse effects.